Part of Travel funnels from the other side, a series on what I learn as a traveller about the booking funnels I usually measure.
In June 2026 I travelled around South Korea. After years of measuring how customers search, book and pay, it was the second trip where I watched myself do it in a market that works differently. The first was Chile and Brazil in 2024. Korea was harder, and more interesting for anyone who works in travel.
Finding my way without Google
Google Maps shows places in Korea, but it would not give me walking or driving directions. The reason is a long-running dispute over taking detailed map data out of the country (background on Wikipedia). In February 2026 the government approved Google's request under strict conditions, but in June the directions still did not work for me. So I did what Koreans do: I moved around with Naver Map and KakaoMap, and I searched on Naver.
Within a couple of days most of my trip happened on Korean platforms. The searches I made, the places I saved and the routes I followed never touched the tools a Western travel brand usually measures.
Booking and paying as a foreigner
Two things stopped me again and again. Many websites asked for a Korean phone number to verify the account, and my foreign card was rejected on several of them. I had seen the same pattern in Chile: the customer is there, wants to pay, and the form decides they cannot.
A gift for a review
The thing that surprised me most happened in shops and restaurants. Several of them offered me a small gift if I left a review on Google or on Naver.
Google's rules for Maps reviews do not allow this. Its Maps content policy lists offering incentives in exchange for reviews as fake engagement. I do not know how strictly Naver applies its own rules, and I am not judging the businesses, which were following what looked like a common local practice. As an analyst, what I noticed was the effect on the data: a rating built partly on rewarded reviews means something different from a rating built on unprompted ones.
What a travel company could take from it
If I worked on the data side of a travel brand selling into Korea, I would look at three things.
- Search demand outside Google. A brand that measures and bids only on Google sees part of the market. Naver has its own search ads and its own webmaster tool, Naver Search Advisor, and the queries that matter may only show up there.
- Review data as a data quality question. If ratings feed a ranking, a recommendation or an analysis that compares markets, they need context: where incentives are common, a 4.8 is a different number. Sudden jumps in the number of reviews for one venue are worth flagging before anyone reads the average.
- The checkout for foreign customers. Errors by form field, split by the visitor's country, show quickly when a phone verification step or a card check is turning away people who wanted to buy.
A question to finish
When you compare ratings or search demand across countries, do you know which platform each market really uses, and how its reviews were collected?